| 2019/09 | Accreditation Standards for PA programs, 5th edition, published (effective date September 2020). |
| 2017/09 | The Commission voted to take the accreditation process for clinical postgraduate programs out of abeyance. A taskforce is charged with developing a proposal for a new accreditation process, timeline and standards. |
| 2015/09 | ARC-PA changes interval between validation reviews from seven to 10 years; ARC-PA approves holding quarterly commission meetings |
| 2015/05 | Feasibility study removed as requirement for provisional applicant programs |
| 2014/03 | First Self Study Report two years before validation visit reviewed |
| 2013/09 | Feasibility study required for provisional applicant programs |
| 2012/11 | ARC-PA announced changes in accreditation process |
| 2010/09 | Standards, 4th edition effective |
| 2008/03 | Commission accredits first two clinical postgraduate PA programs |
| 2007/03 | Commission voted to approve accreditation standards for clinical postgraduate PA programs |
| 2006/09 | Commission adopted a revised policy related to the geographic scope of accreditation |
| 2006/03 | Commission voted to begin accreditation of clinical postgraduate PA programs |
| 2004/10/01 | Commission moved to corporate offices in Duluth, GA (Johns Creek, GA) |
| 2004/01/26 | Commission awarded recognition by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) |
| 2001/03 | Commission awards first program accreditation as a new agency. Commission becomes member of Association of Specialized and Professional Accreditors (ASPA) |
| 2001/01/01 | The Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant (ARC-PA) began operation. |
| 2000/03 | The commissioners of the ARC-PA voted to become a freestanding accrediting agency for the PA profession as of January 1, 2001. |
| 1998 | ASIM returned as a sponsor of the ARC-PA when the association merged with the American College of Physicians. |
| 1996/03 | A study was initiated to determine the feasibility of the ARC-PA withdrawing from the CAAHEP system and establishing itself as a freestanding accrediting agency. |
| 1995/09 | The ARC-PA was incorporated. |
| 1995/03 | The ARC-PA approved the addition of a third representative from APAP. |
| 1994 | CAHEA was dissolved and accreditation activities were transferred to a new, independent agency, the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP). The AMA became the seventh sponsoring organization of the ARC-PA. |
| 1991/09 | The AAPA accepted administrative responsibility for the ARC-PA. The corporate offices of the ARC-PA were established in Marshfield, Wisconsin. |
| 1991/03 | The AMA requested that administrative responsibility for the ARC-PA be undertaken by another sponsoring organization. |
| 1988 | The JRC-PA was renamed the Accreditation Review Committee on Education for the Physician Assistant (ARC-PA). |
| 1982/09 | The sponsoring organizations reduced their representation from three to two members each, except for the American Academy of Physician Assistants, which continued to have three representatives. |
| 1981/12 | The ASIM withdrew its sponsorship of the JRC-PA. |
| 1978 | The JRC-PA sponsors recognized the Association of Physician Assistant Program (APAP) as the seventh sponsor of the JRC-PA. |
| 1976/12 | The AMA House of Delegates voted to delegate its responsibility for adoption of proposed educational standards (also known as “Essentials”) to the AMA Council on Medical Education and authorized the transfer of responsibility for accreditation from the AMA Council on Medical Education to its Committee on Allied Education and Accreditation (CAHEA). This new committee was a modification of the Council’s former advisory Committee on Allied Health Education. These changes were instituted to achieve complete compliance with the US Office of Education criteria for national accrediting agencies. CAHEA was designed to represent communities of interest for which accreditation actions were taken. CAHEA was composed of representatives of allied health professions, medicine, the Council on Medical Education, and the public. |
| 1976 | The review committees for primary care PAs and for Surgeon’s Assistants were merged into the Joint Review Committee on Educational Programs for Physician Assistants. |
| 1975/09 | The ACS became a sponsor of the JRC-PA. |
| 1974/03 | The sponsors of the JRC-PA and the AMA recognized the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) as the fifth sponsor of the JRC-PA. |
| 1973 | The American College of Surgeons (ACS) adopted Essentials for an Educational Program for the Surgeon’s Assistant. Originally the ACS Committee on Allied Health Personnel reviewed applicant programs’ compliance with the Essentials. In April, the JRC-PA added three graduate PAs as members-at-large for one-year terms. |
| 1972/06 | The JRC-PA made its first accreditation recommendations to the AMA. |
| 1972/02/07 | The first formal meeting of the JRC-PA was convened. Dr. Malcolm L. Peterson, representative of the American College of Physicians, was elected the first chairman of the JRC-PA. |
| 1971/12/18 | Organizational meeting of the then-titled Joint Review Committee for Educational Programs for the Assistant to Primary Care Physician (JRC-PA). |
| 1971/11/30 | The AMA House of Delegates, with the endorsements noted and on recommendation of the Council on Medical Education, adopted the Essentials, clearing the way for the approval of educational programs that met or exceeded these requirements. |
| 1971/05/28 | The development of the Essentials of an Accredited Educational Program for the Assistant to the Primary Care Physician was undertaken by the American Medical Association (AMA) Subcommittee of the Council on Medical Education’s Advisory Committee on Education for Allied Health Professions and Services. The Subcommittee included representatives from the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Physicians (ACP), American Society of Internal Medicine (ASIM), American Medical Association (AMA), and Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). The Essentials prepared by the Subcommittee were approved by those organizations except for the AAMC, which declined to approve or endorse the Essentials. |
